2026-04-21 · Center for Modern Health
Dr. Colleen Smith on Healthcare Reform: Breaking Up Big Medicine
with Colleen Smith, MD, Visiting Fellow — Center for Modern Health

In the latest episode of the Health Policy Podcast, Dr. Colleen Smith, an emergency medicine physician and visiting fellow at the Center for Modern Health, discusses healthcare reform and regulation. She addresses the proposed "Breakup Big Medicine Act" by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Josh Hawley, which aims to tackle the increasing vertical integration in healthcare. Dr. Smith advocates for deregulation and increased competition, suggesting reforms such as repealing certificate of need laws and promoting health savings accounts to empower consumers and healthcare providers.
Dr. Colleen Smith Discusses Healthcare Reform and Regulation
Dr. Colleen Smith Discusses Healthcare Reform and Regulation
In a recent episode of the Health Policy Podcast, Dr. Colleen Smith, an emergency medicine physician and visiting fellow at the Center for Modern Health, discussed the complexities of healthcare reform and the challenges posed by vertical integration in the industry. The episode, hosted by Brian Hyde, highlighted the urgent need for policy changes to improve patient care and reduce the influence of large healthcare corporations.
Dr. Smith has practiced emergency medicine in New York City for 14 years. Over the past few years, she has become increasingly involved in health policy, motivated by frustrations with the current healthcare system. She noted that both patients and providers face significant obstacles in accessing necessary care. “I struggle every day because of our system to help my patients get the healthcare that they need,” she said.
The discussion centered on a proposed legislative measure known as the Breakup Big Medicine Act, introduced by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Josh Hawley. The bill aims to address the growing consolidation of healthcare corporations, which have been acquiring smaller practices and pharmacies, leading to a lack of competition in the market. Dr. Smith explained that this consolidation creates a complex web of relationships among hospitals, insurance companies, and pharmacy benefit managers. “Large healthcare corporations have developed and kind of grown almost like they're on steroids,” she said.
Dr. Smith pointed out that this vertical integration often results in backroom deals that prioritize corporate profits over patient care. She emphasized that patients lack purchasing power in this system, as they do not directly control the majority of healthcare spending. “We are not even as much as we're the ones with the skin in the game when we're patients,” she said.
The conversation also touched on the historical context of healthcare regulation in the United States. Dr. Smith traced the roots of the current system back to the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s, which were created in response to rising healthcare costs and the need for coverage for retirees. She explained that subsequent regulations, such as certificate of need laws, have further entrenched the power of large healthcare entities. “It has allowed these large, vertically integrated giant healthcare corporations to sit on the board of certificate of need evaluation boards,” she said.
Dr. Smith argued that breaking up these large corporations without addressing the underlying regulatory framework may not yield the desired improvements. She suggested that a more effective approach would involve deregulating the healthcare market to foster competition. “If you just come at them and break them apart, we're gonna still be left with the same regulatory landscape that we were in to begin with,” she said.
In her article, Dr. Smith proposed several steps to deregulate healthcare and increase competition. She emphasized the need to repeal restrictive laws, such as certificate of need regulations and Stark laws that limit physician ownership of hospitals. Additionally, she advocated for the establishment of health savings accounts to empower patients to manage their healthcare expenses.
Dr. Smith concluded by stressing the importance of creating a competitive healthcare marketplace that prioritizes patient choice and provider autonomy. “We need to do something with regard to health insurance,” she said, suggesting that allowing a marketplace for catastrophic plans could help reduce costs for routine care.
As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, Dr. Smith's insights underscore the critical need for policy reforms that address the challenges posed by consolidation and regulation. The full discussion is available in the latest episode of the Health Policy Podcast.
Interview Q&A
Q&A: Dr. Colleen Smith Discusses Healthcare Reform and Regulation
Dr. Colleen Smith Discusses Healthcare Reform and Regulation
Q: Can you tell us about your background and current work?
A: I am an emergency medicine doctor practicing in New York City for the past 14 years. Recently, I became more involved in health policy because I believe it should be a non-partisan issue. I am frustrated with the healthcare system as both a patient and a doctor, and I want to help improve it.
Q: What is the Center for Modern Health, and what is its mission?
A: The Center for Modern Health is a think tank focused on healthcare reform across the country. It is run by Jared Rhodes, a health policy expert. The center aims to modify health policy and the regulatory landscape to support the freedom of patients and healthcare providers.
Q: What is the "Breakup Big Medicine Act"?
A: The "Breakup Big Medicine Act" is a bill proposed by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Josh Hawley. It addresses the rapid growth of large healthcare corporations that are acquiring smaller practices and pharmacies, leading to a lack of competition in healthcare.
Q: How has vertical integration affected healthcare?
A: Vertical integration in healthcare has led to large corporations controlling various aspects of the system, including hospitals, insurance companies, and pharmacies. This consolidation can create conflicts of interest and limit patient choices, as many patients do not have the purchasing power to influence these corporations.
Q: Can you provide an example of vertical integration that works well?
A: Costco is a good example of effective vertical integration. They manage the entire supply chain for their rotisserie chickens, ensuring high standards for health and safety. This allows them to offer quality products at lower prices, benefiting consumers.
Q: How does competition in healthcare differ from other industries?
A: Unlike industries like retail, where consumers have choices, healthcare often lacks competition. Patients typically have limited options for providers and services, which diminishes their ability to influence prices and quality.
Q: What historical factors contributed to the current state of healthcare regulation?
A: The establishment of Medicare and Medicaid after the Great Depression played a significant role in shaping healthcare regulation. As companies began offering health insurance as a benefit, the government stepped in to provide coverage for retirees, leading to increased regulations over time.
Q: What are certificate of need laws, and how do they impact healthcare?
A: Certificate of need laws were implemented to control healthcare costs by regulating the supply of services. However, they often allow large healthcare corporations to veto new competitors, which can stifle innovation and keep prices high.
Q: What steps could be taken to deregulate healthcare?
A: A two-pronged approach is needed: freeing producers and consumers. This includes repealing certificate of need laws and allowing doctors to own hospitals. Additionally, promoting health savings accounts and reforming health insurance regulations could empower consumers.
Q: How might transparency in healthcare pricing affect competition?
A: While transparency is generally positive, it could lead to a situation where consumers flock to the most visible options rather than encouraging competition. This could reduce bargaining power and keep prices high.
Q: What are some potential outcomes of breaking up large healthcare corporations?
A: Breaking up large corporations may not solve the underlying issues in the healthcare system. The same regulatory landscape would remain, and it could lead to unintended consequences that do not improve competition or patient care.
Q: What is your overall perspective on healthcare reform?
A: I believe that we need to rethink our approach to healthcare reform, focusing on empowering both patients and providers. We must create a system that fosters competition and innovation rather than relying on large, integrated corporations.
Key takeaways
- “I'm frustrated with it, both as a patient and as a doctor.”
- “I think that it should be a non-partisan issue, and I think everyone in this country is frustrated with the way that healthcare is.”
- “We're not really in, we are not even as much as we're the ones with the skin in the game when we're patients speaking as a patient, we also don't have very much of the purchasing power.”
- “The problem is in healthcare, there's not another choice.”
- “We've just entirely eliminated competition almost from the marketplace.”
About the guest

Visiting Fellow — Center for Modern Health
Colleen Smith, MD. Colleen Smith is a Clinical Policy Analyst at the Center for Modern Health. She is also an emergency medicine physician who currently practices in New York City. She completed medical school in Atlanta, Gerogia, at Emory University School of Medicine, residency in Emergency Medicine at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, and a fellowship in Medical Simulation and Education at New York University and Bellevue Hospitals. In addition to contributing to our policy work, Colleen also writes about health policy, medical education, and her experiences of the American healthcare system on her personal Substack.
Full transcript
Show full transcriptHide transcript
Filed under
